Domain evaluation & red-teaming
Design realistic drug-development tasks, expert rubrics and failure taxonomies; run blinded review and produce an evidence-backed evaluation report.
REGULATORYX / AI ASSURANCE
RegulatoryX is VED’s emerging US-based AI-assurance capability: expert-led evaluation for life-sciences AI companies and controlled workflow pilots for drug-development teams.

VED working method
TWO BUYING JOURNEYS
Design realistic drug-development tasks, expert rubrics and failure taxonomies; run blinded review and produce an evidence-backed evaluation report.
Select one valuable workflow, define context of use, configure human review and measure time, quality and risk before scaling.
INITIAL USE CASES
Test whether an AI identifies material issues, uses relevant evidence and distinguishes fact, inference and recommendation.
Evaluate question quality, sponsor-position logic, source use and handling of uncertainty.
Detect contradictions, missing dependencies, unsupported claims and cross-document inconsistency.
Assess retrieval quality, jurisdiction, effective date, applicability and citation traceability.
Pilot source-grounded retrieval, decision logs and controlled reuse across an R&D programme.
Create realistic tasks and gold-standard reasoning from regulatory, clinical, biomarker, writing and data experts.
EVALUATION METHOD
THE COMPOUNDING ASSET
The long-term RegulatoryX opportunity is a permissioned library of expert-authored tasks, adjudication rubrics, failure patterns and workflow controls for drug development. It should be built from paid projects and explicit rights—not from speculative software development or confidential client documents.
Start with the constraint
Share the situation, evidence and timing. We will propose the smallest credible first step.